Home
Dramatis Personae
Archives
Contact
Amazon wish list
Cole’s birthday - 10/24
Monk’s birthday - 12/2
Dru’s birthday - 1/5
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
adam host
julie template queen
kd general lusciousness
pea guru
Powered byMovable Type 1.5
« Rall Rails. | Main | Waking up late and other tales of woe »
I'm not getting at all that this woman was in any way acting in a manner that would indicate that she is a danger to her child. Sure, her behavior was a little strange, but she GAVE BIRTH ON A FREAKING TRAIN! Wouldn't you be a little out of sorts if you did that?
This article tries to make it sound as if there is something clearly very off about this woman, and in fact her baby was taken from her due to her "bizarre behavior." It sounds reasonable to me that she would refuse help from the train passengers, considering she's a nurse...and it sounds like she handled things quite well. I suppose the fact that she didn't need a doctor to help her deliver a baby is grounds for investigation.
And it's weirdly contradictory. Like there's this description:
About 90 seconds later, Chin said, ''I saw a head, then full baby fall out from her skirt, hit the floor sideways and slide the length of the doorway, stopping when he bumped up against the next row of seats. Still she stared out the window. Either she didn't know it happened or didn't want to acknowledge it.''
followed by this:
Judge bent down, picked up the baby and wrapped it in her scarf, Chin said.
If the baby had slid all over the place (which I don't particularly think is a sign that the mother is abusive or "off" - there is, after all, well-documented evidence that women giving birth enter a trance-like state) how could the mother simply "bend down" to pick the baby up.
The article ends:
DSS, which has no record of any prior contact with the family, placed Judge's two other children in temporary custody yesterday. Denise Monteiro, a DSS spokeswoman, said the baby will not be released to Judge, who said she works for Boston Public Schools in food and nutritional services, unless the agency is convinced she can care for the child. The hospital is conducting a psychiatric evaluation of Judge, Monteiro said.''We're trying to find out what prompted this behavior,'' she said. ''It makes us concerned about her and it makes us concerned about her baby.''
And I'm freaked out by this. Why have they taken this woman's children from her? And why are we not hearing her side of the story in this article? This was very disconcerting for me, and I can't quite put a finger on it.
Thanks to Jessica for the link.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt.riceweevil.com/tb/731
I think one reason we're not hearing her side is (according, of course, to this reporter) that she hasn't spoken to pretty much anyone in a long while.
Yeah. I still don't know what to make of it. The article seemed really weird. Granted, the situation did seem strange, but I dunno.
It is apparent, based on what was written in the article, that the woman is possibly depressed. But is depression grounds for losing your children? She did appear to care for the baby after the birth. I get the impression that the article was trying to imply that maybe she was going to throw the baby in a garbage can or something, but she clearly did not. And someone who did not care at all would not object to having her child taken and examined by the officers.
I dunno. I could just be being overly mama bear about this, but something sounds really fucking fishy. If the woman's intention was to harm the baby, she could have just stayed home and had it, and there would have been fewer witnesses.
I had to laugh out loud about her picking up the after birth, in mid-stride, tossing it in her shoulder bag, and continuing to walk away! It sounds to me like she was trying hard to take care of herself in a bad situation, and maybe up until the minute the baby delivered, she was trying to convince herself this just wasn't happening, or that she had time to get to the hospital. I can see getting a psych eval while she's in the hospital, and keeping her and baby there til they know everything is ok. But placing this baby, and her other children, in state care is way overboard, in my opinion.